Friday, January 25, 2019

The Say-Do Method



Today I was working with a teacher, Elizabeth, who felt that lesson pacing was affecting the engagement of students in her class. I’d been in the room and agreed.  I could see that waiting for all students to be focused was actually making it harder for all students to be focused – too much dead air space!  I noticed that Elizabeth had printed the word PACING in large letters in her notebook.  “Working on pacing sounds like a good goal,” I said.  “What is it about pacing that you want to work on?”   Elizabeth hummed and looked pensive.  She had a few false starts. I almost rushed in with my own words.  Then I had the thought, “If you can’t say it, you can’t do it.”

After a little more think time, Elizabeth replied, “Make sure wait time doesn’t cause disengagement.”  She had it!  I handed Elizabeth a 3X5 card to write her goal on, so that she could keep it in a place where she’d see it often.  We made an appointment to talk about her progress, and I offered to come observe again; if she thought that would be helpful, she could let me know.

Reflecting on this conversation, I realize how close I came to undermining the opportunity.  If we had left the goal broad, “PACING,” it would have been hard to plan for and measure progress.  If I had supplied the words when she faltered, I would have minimized Elizabeth’s agency and her motivation for working toward the goal.  Instead, because she had crafted the goal herself, she had ownership of it and purpose for her effort.

This Say-Do method, where the goal-setter thoughtfully and precisely defines the objective, makes coaching more effective by empowering teachers to take the lead.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

Real PD:



Sticks and spoons for student engagement:



Benefits of reading aloud:



The 10th Annual World Read Aloud Day is Feb. 1:



When coaches get too many “other duties as assigned”:


That’s it for this week.  Happy coaching!

Was this helpful?  Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)
Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Funneling or Focusing: Using Questions to Support Thinking


Asking questions is the fulcrum of the GIR model, the coaching moves that gives the bulk of the decision-making to the teacher.  If you have been working with a teacher on something that was new for them, like differentiation or technology integration, you probably offered a lot of support initially, modeling and making recommendations. When teachers have more experience with the approach, you want them to take ownership for it. You do this by asking questions – but be careful what you ask.

Math teachers sometimes talk about two types of questions: funneling and focusing. Funneling questions start broad and get narrow, leading the learner to your answer – the idea or approach you had in your head.  Focusing questions support the learner’s responses and guide them based on their own problem-solving pattern. Although there are times when funneling is the right approach, when you are ready to tip the balance and shift responsibility to the teacher, focusing questions will be your friend.

A focusing pattern of questioning will center on the teacher’s contributions. You listen to the teacher and consider her responses, asking follow-up questions that center on these ideas.  The result is a conversation built on your expectation that the teacher now has the experience to think strategically about how to use the new approach.  Focusing questions demonstrate your respect for the teacher’s ideas.

Focusing questions are more open-ended and thought-provoking than funneling ones. Compare the two coaching conversations below:

Funneling
Teacher: I’m planning the final project for the unit and wanted to think of some ways to differentiate.
Coach: We’ve talked about differentiating the process, product, and content. Do you want to try differentiating all three for this project?
Teacher: Sure.
Coach: Have you considered using the RAFT format?
Teacher: I don’t think I’ve heard of that.
Coach: RAFT is an acronym that stands for Role of the writer, audience, format, and topic. You make a chart to give students choices about each.

This is an extreme example, but you get the idea. It is the coach’s thinking that is at the center of this conversation.  Here’s another example:

Focusing
Teacher: I’m planning the final project for the unit and wanted to think of some ways to differentiate.
Coach: What are some of the ideas you’ve been thinking about for the project?
Teacher: I really don’t have any solid ideas yet, but I want students to really be able to demonstrate that they understand different perspectives about immigration.
Coach:  You want each student’s project to represent multiple perspectives?
Teacher: Maybe. Or maybe they could choose which perspective they want to represent. And then when they present, everyone would experience those multiple perspectives.
Coach: Hmmmm.  Either way could be valuable. Do you think students could be successful with either type of project – taking multiple perspectives or choosing one to focus on?
Teacher: Some could handle a multiple perspectives project, but I’m feeling like we’d get to the same purpose, and maybe go deeper, if each student chose a perspective they wanted to represent.
Coach: So, what are those perspectives? Do you want to give students a list to choose from?

In this conversation, the coach guides the teacher to examine her own ideas. Although funneling might be a helpful form of questioning when there is one right answer or when a teacher gets stuck, a focusing conversation supports teacher exploration and problem-solving, giving the teacher ownership for solutions. Focusing tips the scale, giving the teacher the problem-solving power.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

Advice for new coaches:



Ways students can use Pinterest in the classroom:



A well-balanced diet – choice and parameters in reading and writing:



As the new year gets underway, you might consider: Is balance the right goal for life?


If you still want to strive for more balance, consider the acronym SPREAD:


That’s it for this week.  Happy Coaching!

Was this helpful?  Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)
Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!

Friday, January 4, 2019

Wait Time


There’s a wise Quaker saying that applies to coaching: “Never miss an opportunity to keep your mouth shut.”

You know about wait time – you’re a pro at it with kids. The next time you’re coaching, do a self-check on how you do with teachers.

After asking a question, give teachers the gift of time and receptivity. Sit down. Make eye contact.  Don’t appear rushed or make the teacher feel rushed. When they pause, don’t be quick to give a response.  Instead, ask them to, “Say more about that.” Or say, “Yes, go on.”  Or just pause and offer silence.

It sounds easy, but listening and waiting can be hard work!  As we give our attention to teachers’ thinking, we give them space to reflect. We give them space to wonder. We give them space to generate new ideas.

After the teacher has had a chance to think things through, enter in and reflect back what you heard.  Paraphrase those new ideas. Restate what they seem interested in or excited about.

It can be hard work to keep your mouth shut – but the coaching rewards are worth it!


This week, you might want to take a look at:

A 10-minute podcast about creating meaningful learning experiences (for teachers and students):



Questions worth considering about coaching ethics:



When reading response becomes a task:



Giving students checklists to keep them focused:



Ways students can use Pinterest in the classroom:


That’s it for this week.  Happy Coaching!

Was this helpful?  Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)
Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!