Friday, December 30, 2016

Reserving Judgment

"Reserving judgements is a matter of infinite hope."
F. Scott Fitzgerald, in The Great Gatsby

Following classroom observations, it’s easy to judge and recommend. And there are times when a recommendation is the “just right” coaching move. But frequently, asking a question is a more cognitively engaging approach. I love the Fitzgerald quote, above, because it demonstrates positive assumptions. Rather than judging, I can ask a question that helps me understand a teacher’s thinking. And that thinking might be brilliant!

The chart below lists some things I saw during a recent observation. I noted these in all caps in my notes so that I would be sure to address them during our debrief. (I’ve found that hitting the “caps lock” key is the quickest way to emphasize something while I script a lesson.) When planning for our conference, I crafted the questions to the right.

When I saw this…..
I asked this….
On lesson plans, an objective was to use the associative property, but during the lesson students were encouraged to use grouping to multiply.
Where were you expecting students to use the associative property?
Teacher asked students to rewrite their solution to the math problem on the board to show their thinking to the class.
Why did you use the board instead of the document camera to show student work?
A student who had used an efficient strategy that wasn’t noted by the teacher during whole group discussion.
Did you see Adrian's thinking?
A star on the paper of a student who had an incorrect answer.
What does it mean when you put a star on a student’s paper?
Some students not working, some finished; teacher gives class more time to work.
Why did you give students more time to work?

What follows these questions might be a recommendation, but often the act of questioning prompts an insightful explanation or the teacher’s own appropriate adaptations or next steps. For example, when I asked the question about the associative property, the teacher realized on her own that she was mislabeling the strategy. My question about the document camera was a bit of a disguised recommendation, but I honestly thought she might have a specific reason for the recopying. Instead, my question led her to revise her approach to having students share their work, using the document camera to save time and enhance visibility. My question about Adrian led to a discussion of not only this student, but how others might benefit from a differentiated assignment. That’s not where I expected that question to go, but it made an excellent area of focus as the teacher planned an upcoming lesson.

Restraining judgement and, instead, asking questions can reap rewards, encouraging teachers to take an active role during debrief conversations.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

Coaching for differentiation:



Measuring student engagement with an “engagometer”:



Ed Week special issue on writing: Ideas for developing students' analytical skills and the role of creative writing in the classroom:



This video on station rotations and other approaches to blended learning:



Content-area literacy or disciplinary literacy – what’s the shift and how does it look across disciplines:


That’s it for this week. Happy Coaching!

Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!


Friday, December 16, 2016

Two Ways to Mirror

Coaching begins with understanding and being understood. One of the subtle ways we feel understood is when our thinking partner mirrors our body language. For example, this week, a frustrated teacher came to me with a problem. She was agitated, speaking quick and high, leaning forward. I responded in like – an urgency in my voice and a posture that matched her own. Even though she likely couldn’t have said why, this teacher felt understood.

But I realized that her agitated state didn’t lend itself to thoughtful consideration. So after initially mirroring her body language, I recognized the need for a shift, and I sat back in my chair. I rested my arms on the arm rests and slowed the cadence of my speech. My body language became a model for the teacher to mirror, and her agitation ebbed. Soon, we were ready for dialogue that led to potential solutions.

This situation demonstrates two examples of mirroring. When I mirrored the teacher’s emotions, she felt she had a partner in her problem-solving venture. When I provided a posture she could mirror, she calmed, and we were able to approach the situation from a more productive stance.

Although words are a coach’s primary tool, don’t underestimate the role that body language, pace, and tone play in the coaching scenario. Mirrors can work both ways.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

This video about building trust with students:



Candyland and class rules:



Listen to this podcast for ideas to teach students through play:



A Pinterest board with picture books for teaching punctuation:



Content-area literacy or disciplinary literacy – what’s the shift and how does it look across disciplines:


That’s it for this week. Happy Coaching!

Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!



Friday, December 9, 2016

Beneath the Mask

A few years ago, I did coaching work in a district that had coaches in every building and a strict policy for their coaches: No coaching on classroom management. Although this seemed harsh, I suspect it helped coaches and teachers look beneath the mask and find out what may have been causing those concerns about behavior.

A coaching situation this week reminded me of this policy. I observed a lesson where the teacher, Amanda, was frequently asking for students’ attention and repeating herself when students couldn’t answer her questions. Just before our debrief conversation, I silently repeated this mantra: “This conversation will not be about classroom management; this conversation will not be about classroom management; this conversation will not be about classroom management!” I was afraid that the most obvious features of the lesson would distract our discussion from what was really going on.

I’d worked with Amanda before, and after chatting briefly about what she felt was successful in the lesson, I ventured a query: “What’s something you’d like to focus on in the coming weeks?” I braced myself and mentally prepared for a redirecting follow-up question so that our talk wouldn’t center around student behavior issues. But I was pleasantly surprised when Amanda replied, “I want to work on student engagement.”

Amanda had pushed herself to look beneath the mask of student misbehavior and figure out what was really happening. She brought up concerns about pacing and questioning, and we talked about differentiation and all-respond techniques. In the end, she decided to focus on making sure explanations of content and directions for activities were clear. She has a plan for modeling and providing shared practice.

I’m looking forward to my next chance to be in Amanda’s classroom. Because she was able to look beneath the mask of classroom management and create a plan for bringing more clarity to her teaching, I’m confident student engagement, and consequently student learning, will increase. Although student behaviors and misbehaviors may be staring you in the face, classroom management, most importantly, is about pedagogy.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

The writing notebook as a lifeline for writers:



Towards data-informed (not data-drive) instruction:



Students in countries with high math performance memorize less:



Tips for helping students pick a just-right book:



Why students can’t Google their way to the truth:




That’s it for this week. Happy Coaching!

Friday, December 2, 2016

Mistakes Worth Making

Mistakes are part of the dues one pays for a full life.
                                                                                                    Sophia Loren, actress

In the classroom, there’s an interesting relationship between control and intellectual challenge. Tasks that are easy to control often have a low cognitive load. For example, twenty-five students sitting in rows working independently to complete a worksheet might be orderly and compliant, but the intellectual work they are doing could be quite minimal. On the other hand, groups of students gathered in pockets around the room reenacting the rotation of the earth around the sun might look a bit messy, but there’s probably a lot of learning going on.

Researchers have found a correlation between a teacher’s ability to manage a classroom flexibly and that teacher’s ability to teach in an intellectually challenging way. I’m sure it’s not a direct correlation, but it seems to me that during instruction, the more control of the task the teacher has, the less students are learning. I’m not advocating chaos, but I am hoping for classrooms where students have the opportunity to own their learning.

Right now I’m working with a novice teacher who is not afraid to take risks. I observed the earth rotation activity, described above, in her classroom. I also watched when groups of students were sprawled on the floor with markers and big sheets of bulletin board paper, demonstrating their math methodology and promoting their strategy as the one that should be highlighted by the group. There were lots of problems with that lesson – not only from a management perspective, but also with formative assessment and communication of content. But when we got together to debrief, I started with applause. Applause for taking the risk and teaching a lesson that was harder to control. Applause for modelling the courteous dialogue she expected. Applause for the critical thinking students were doing as they compared their problem-solving strategy with their peers.

Then we talked about what a great opportunity the lesson provided for us to see some things that needed work. Students completing a page of math problem might have looked like impressive classroom management and appropriate skills practice, but it wouldn’t have opened windows of opportunity for us to dig in deeply together about the complexities of formative assessment that reared their ugly heads because of the flexibility of the work students were doing.

I’m always grateful for teachers who are willing to take a risk and exchange control for challenge. And I know it’s an extra risk to teach such a lesson when I’m there observing. But there is so much more grist for the mill from open-ended, complex tasks than from lessons that keep kids working quietly. I’ve sat through many an expressive read-aloud, with students sitting quietly, that provided little fodder for coaching conversation. Exchanging control for challenge means taking a risk. Taking a risk leads to mistakes. And mistakes can be the path to learning and growth, for both students and teachers.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

Intensive coaching is important for new teachers:


Twitter-style exit tickets:


Sharable articles on the research that should guide literacy instruction:



Three questions to determine importance in a text:



Show and Tell: How important objects inspire personal narrative:


That’s it for this week. Happy Coaching!


Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!