Friday, January 23, 2015

Least Restrictive Environment

As educators, we’re familiar with use of the term “least restrictive environment” when it comes to students with IEPs. But have we thought about it in terms of the teachers we mentor and coach?

Perhaps you’ve seen this play out at your school. Although some teachers are required to follow the curriculum to the letter, the principal is fine with other teachers operating behind closed doors (ignoring pacing guides, required material, etc.) because they’ve proven that their students will achieve.

Now let’s think about what “least restrictive environment” means for mentoring and coaching.  Novices may need a more restrictive environment: doing exactly what you recommend so that students receive solid instruction. We make the environment less restrictive for them as they show what they’re capable of. More expertise means more freedom. It should also mean a change in our coaching conversations.

As teachers become more proficient, we can refine our mentoring. We recommend less and ask questions more. And we can focus our questions on aspects of instruction where teachers get the most bang for their buck.

One of the most important aspects of good instruction, across all disciplines and grade levels, is the inclusion of talk. Asking good questions and facilitating discussions that involve all learners enhances student learning.  This week, I talked with coaches about how they were helping teachers improve their discussion skills. Their responses demonstrated a range of coaching moves, differentiated to match the needs of the teachers they were working with.

One mentor gave both a resource and a recommendation. She gave the teacher a depth-of-knowledge chart and encouraged her to use the chart to help her formulate good questions. She suggested the teacher plan questions in advance and write them on her lesson plans. These resources and recommendations provided strong scaffolding for the teacher as she worked to improve her class discussions.

Similarly, another coach suggested that questions be prepared ahead of time and encouraged use of text-dependent questions during a read-aloud.  Her specific recommendations provided a focus for an upcoming lesson.

Another coach made a recommendation that the teacher call on the quiet students. After the teacher put this into action, the coach followed up by asking, “What do you notice about their answers?” This combination of recommending and questioning increased the teacher’s responsibility, encouraging reflection that supported future decision making.

A thought-provoking question was asked by the coach of a teacher who was more proficient in leading class discussions. This coach asked, “How do you choose who to ask?” Her question prompted thoughtful reflection on the part of the teacher – introspection that led her to refine this decision-making process that happens almost instantaneously.

From providing resources and recommendations to making specific recommendations and asking questions, the coaches' support was differentiated to give the “least restrictive” coaching that would result in improved classroom discourse.

What’s the least restrictive environment for the teachers you are working with? Just like students with IEP’s, it will be different for each and every one!




This week, you might want to take a look at:

NCTE Student Writing Awards: February 13 is the deadline!




The A-B-Cs of Giving Feedback to a Colleague:



Honor your colleagues and their professional choice by sharing the sentiments in this blog post:



A video about having students create vocabulary paint chips:



A thoughtful discussion with Charlotte Danielson (author of Frameworks for Teaching) about the Common Core State Standards (just click on the X to close the annoying pop-up):




That’s it for this week.  Happy coaching!

No comments:

Post a Comment