Friday, March 2, 2018

Deconstructing Serial Conversations

There’s just not enough time in the day for all the conversations we’d like to have!  I ran into this problem as I worked with Meg this week.
 
Meg is an early-career teacher who is still struggling with classroom management.  Although she has adopted some effective approaches and worked to increase the engagement factor in her lessons, some students are hanging on to their old, disruptive habits.  I was able to stop by her class this week, but there wasn’t a chance for us to get together and talk about it. Still, I wanted to share some ideas with her before the context grew cold.  So I decided to email.
 
Email can be both boon and bane when coaching.  The ease of access and ability to communicate asynchronously are big bonuses.  But these serial conversations don’t give us the opportunity to read the body language of the receiver, and the teacher may not get a clear idea of our intent and tone without the face-to-face. Still, from time to time it seems like the best choice.
 
When constructing my part of an email coaching conversation, I have the advantage of really thinking through my words and the response they may elicit.  That is a benefit that can carry a lot of weight!  So I compose slowly and thoughtfully, then reread from the recipient’s perspective before pressing “send.”
 
Below is the email I sent to Meg after stopping by.  I’ve annotated it so you can see what I was thinking as I put my words together.  (Click on the image to see it bigger.)
 

 
Thankfully, the email was well-received. Meg replied, “Yes, that does make sense. Less discussion on the front end is a good idea. I will be sure to do that this week. Thanks for the feedback!
 
Meg and I had a chance the next day to sit down together and discuss Meg’s concerns. We named a problem that was occurring:  Lessons were getting waylaid as she dealt with individual student’s needs. Meg set a goal to handle these more effectively.  I felt like this was an appropriate goal, and I promised to check back.
 
Today, while I was popping into classrooms, I saw an expert teacher manage these same, potentially-disruptive issues seamlessly. I noticed what she was doing and sent Meg this email:
 



Notice that I didn’t say, “Hey, I saw a teacher who does this way better than you do,” but I did plant the seed for a different way for Meg to approach disruptions.  We’ll see if it takes root!
 
Because I’m a bit of a word nerd, I like thinking about the impact the words I choose will have.  Words are filed with connotations, and these connotations make a difference in the way our ideas our received.  Especially in emails and other forms of serial communication, it pays to handle words with care.
 
 
This week, you might want to take a look at:
 
Ideas for cooperative learning (from Jim Knight):
 
 
 
Mentor texts for essay writing:
 
 
 
Austin’s butterfly, peer feedback, and revision (with Rick Wormeli) :
 
 
 
What is number sense and why is it important:
 
 
 
Lessons for social-emotional learning:
 
 
 
That’s it for this week.  Happy Coaching!

Friday, February 23, 2018

Teacher Learning as Spontaneous Combustion

Today I was witness to one of those magical moments teacher live for – when learning erupts like spontaneous combustion, burning new ideas forever into students’ minds.

In our PLC we’ve been working on discussion strategies – ways to support genuine conversation among students, where students initiate topics and make unsolicited contributions. We’ve been leading up to grand conversations, supporting students as they take ownership for their own learning and consider, extend, and sometimes refute one another’s ideas.

Amy’s fourth-grade class has been studying Native American folktales. They had read Coyote Places the Stars and How the Stars Fell into the Sky, and today they were ready for a grand conversation. Amy invited me in to observe so that we could reflect together on the experience.  As the lesson began, I heard Amy launch the discussion with an open-ended question: “What were some of the similarities and differences between these two book?” Students jumped in with comments about the different tribes, their settings, and the characters in the stories. One student, Ashley, made an astute comment revealing the character trait of patience, “She said she would like to do it for the rest of her life,” she said. Amy jumped on this opportunity to support students’ understanding of an important theme in the story. “Did you guys hear what Ashley said?” she queried.  Ashley, say it again.”  As Ashley repeated her answer, students physically leaned in to attend to her comment. The discussion continued with students stating their observations and ideas and often asking their peers, “What do you think?” It was clear Amy had laid the groundwork for this discussion.  

As the conversation turned to the ending of How the Stars Fell, one of the students asked, “But what’s the lesson? There isn’t a lesson!” “There is a lesson,” another responded. Students batted around a few ideas, then one said, “I think that it’s about patience, because in one story, the coyote just got impatient and threw the stars into the sky, but in the other one he took his time.”  (Wow!) Another added, “I agree with what Vicki said, because it took many moons to put the stars in a nice way, but in this one, he just threw all the stars and made a mess.”

At this point, the students’ ideas were really jelling. Amy jumped in. “I agree,” she said. “I think Coyote’s character in this book was impatient, didn’t care about what First Woman thought, but in the other book, Coyote wanted to make his friends happy and honor his friends.” The discussion continued, with students bringing in other important ideas, and the lesson ended with an opportunity for students to write about their new understandings. So much thinking and learning had occurred!

As I prepare to talk with Amy about this lesson, there is much to celebrate! Students’ engagement in and ownership of the discussion was palpable. They actively encouraged each other to participate and they came on their own to key ideas. The thoughtful, open-ended questions that Amy had prepared in advance and the occasional follow-up prompts and probes she asked bore fruit as the students commented and queried one another.

One of my favorite points in the lesson was when Amy asked Ashley to restate her comment because it illustrated an important theme. This was powerful, because it kept the learning in students’ hands, which heightened their engagement.  I wondered why Amy took a different tack later, as this theme solidified through discussion. Instead of asking students to restate or rephrase, instead of asking a follow-up question to get students to synthesize, Amy did the heavy lifting and summarized their discussion.

I’m hoping that a take-away from our debrief will be Amy’s recognition of the power of students’ self-discovery. Initially, Amy guided the learning by drawing attention to an astute comment, and students built on that comment.  This approach could have served equally well to summarize the learning.

With this in mind, here’s what I’m planning for the coaching conversation with this talented teacher who has accomplished so much in supporting students’ discussion skills. I plan to lead with a comment about how amazing it was to watch the conversation unfold and then ask, “Why do you think this discussion worked so well?” I’m sure I’ll learn a thing or two about how to support rich discussion as our own conversation unfolds.  I hope she’ll mention Ashley’s early comment that lead to the patience theme, and I’ll again have the chance to affirm her teacher moves, emphasizing the learning that occurred when she gave the teaching power to Ashley.  I might ask, “Were there other times in the lesson when you did this?” and later, “Were there other times in the lesson when you could have done this?”

The coaching conversation is playing out in my mind.  I hope it unfolds in a way that will ignite Amy’s desire to routinely give the teaching power to students during discussions. As I affirm and question, I think Amy will become more aware of the effects of the moves she makes as she actively guides, rather than leads, discussions.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

Coaching for equity:



Mentor texts for teaching endings (plus a chance to reminisce about your favorites):



Ideas for media literacy:



Dear Parents (or teachers):



Who are the quiet powerhouses in your classroom? Check out this Ted talk about the power of introverts for ideas:



That’s it for this week.  Happy Coaching!

Was this helpful?  Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)


Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!

Saturday, February 17, 2018

Yo-Yo Coaching

In my work with an early-career teacher named Kelli, I’m a yo-yo coach, pivoting back and forth between coaching moves in an effort to keep her moving forward.

Kelli vacillates between over-confidence (is it for real?) and doubt about her teaching skills.  There has not been a clear gradual increase of responsibility for Kelli as we work together. Instead, I find myself recommending – even when she is confident. And affirming, especially when her confidence wains.  These coaching moves are a natural part of my coaching repertoire, but with most teachers, I move through them in a more systematic way.  When working with Kelli, however, I pull them out on an as-needed basis.

However, now that we’ve been working together for a while, I find that questioning is becoming a more effective move. It helps with Kelli when I open with a general question about her work.  After she talks, I rephrase, trying to state back clearly and concisely what I’ve heard.  Having listened, I’m ready to ask a follow-up question that moves beyond the surface level – is there more?  I try to make sure my probing question comes from a genuine stance of curiosity. Then it’s time for listening, couched before and after in a silent pause.

One might say that the GIR model is falling apart with Kelli, since I’m not systematically following the model.  But really that is a benefit of the GIR model. It makes us more aware of our coaching moves and the varying support they provide so that we can choose the tool to fit the circumstance, following that wiggly line toward improved teaching and learning.



This week, you might want to take a look at:

Mentor texts with characters who write:



Talk “with” students, not “at” them:



Time management tips for teachers:



Avoid misconceptions about growth mindset:



Using podcasts to share learning:


That’s it for this week!  Happy Coaching!

Was this helpful?  Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)
Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!


Friday, February 9, 2018

Flowing Forward: Supporting an Attitude of "Becoming" in Ourselves and Others

In the sixth century BC, Greek philosopher Heraclitus said that nothing in this world is constant except change and becoming.  His treatise, About Nature, includes the aphorism:  Everything flows; nothing stands still.  Becoming assumes a changing into and moving toward.

What are you changing into? Who is the coach you are becoming? Who are the teachers you work with becoming?  Unless we cultivate an attitude of becoming, we (and those we work with) may remain stagnant. Stagnant. Even the word is unattractive.

But becoming, ah, there’s a word for you! Developing, ripening, emerging, enhancing – that is what we are shooting for!

The teachers we work with have not deliberately chosen a path of stagnation, but sometimes, it feels like all we can do is maintain the status quo amid the busy-ness of our lives as teachers.  We can support a becoming attitude with our colleagues through our work as coaches.

When we point out teachers’ strengths, and help them build upon those strengths, we support becoming.  When we ask teachers about perceived weaknesses, and help them plan for improvement, we support becoming.  As we encourage teachers to look at challenges as opportunities for growth, we are also supporting becoming.

Sara, a kindergarten teacher I work with, has an exceptionally challenging class this year.  A five-year-old with an oppositional defiant disorder; another with severe ADHD; one who is non-verbal. And the list doesn’t stop there. Although there have been moments of frustration, Sara has consistently met the challenge with a Zen-like attitude: “How will this help me grow? What can I learn from it?”  Because of her attitude of becoming, Sara is able to support students during melt-downs, redirect inappropriate behavior with firmness and compassion, and build a safe environment of participation in her classroom.

When Sara and I meet, we celebrate small steps forward.  Because I am not in her class every day, I’m able to notice changes that are invisible to Sara.  We visualize together what next steps will be for her and for her students. Creating that image of “what might be” supports the process of becoming.  We are curious, wondering together about possible causes and solutions. Our curiousity gives us an orientation of becoming toward both Sara and her students, and it helps us approach uncertainty more positively.

As we build on strengths and shore up areas of weakness, as we visualize and celebrate successes and approach challenges with curiosity, we are cultivating an attitude of becoming in ourselves and those we work with.  We re-form ourselves, and we help others in the process of transformation.  We coach toward potentiality and build toward the coaches and teachers we will eventually be.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

How to use DonorsChoose to fund your classroom dreams:


Using video for self-reflection:


Have fun, develop language, and sharpen summarizing skills:

Helping learners set goals:


Ted Talk – Every kid needs a champion:


That’s it for this week.  Happy Coaching!

Was this helpful?  Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)

Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!


Friday, February 2, 2018

AIM to Affirm

Andi is one of those teachers for whom instruction seems to come naturally. She is so tuned in to her students’ needs, and she radiates positivity. She loves what she does and it shows.  How does a coach support a teacher like Andi, who is doing so much so well?  Is there a need?

I assert that even “Andi’s” benefit from a coach’s support. Teaching is hard work, and we all need celebrations. So even time spent working with expert teachers is worthwhile. But when our coaching “go-to” moves are highly-supportive, it may be hard to adjust the scaffolding we provide to match the needs of already-skillful teachers. That is where affirming comes in.

In the GIR model (below), affirming is portrayed as a coaching move that provides less support, even, than asking questions. We use it when reflection has become automatic, when teachers are already asking themselves the questions that we might ask otherwise.  An affirmation compliments the teacher and validates what she is doing. It is a feel-good statement that supports positive relationships. It also supports the continuation of effective instructional practices.

But an affirmation does not a conversation make.  How do we have an extended coaching discussion with someone who is already doing so much so well?  To keep myself from slipping back into overly-supportive mode, I use the acronym AIM. AIM stands for three types of statements I can make during a coaching conversation that don’t let me slide back to giving more help than is needed. When I AIM to affirm, I assert, invite, and mirror.

Asserting means that I make a declarative statement. I just say something the way I see it. With Andi, I asserted, “The pace of your questioning during the read aloud supported students’ engagement.” Andi paused thoughtfully and responded, “I was careful not to ask too many questions because I didn’t want to distract from their enjoyment and the flow of the story.”

Inviting means that I prompt the teacher to elaborate. “Say more about that,” I prompted Andi.  She described how the questions she did ask drew students’ attention to important aspects of the story. “I wanted to make sure they noticed that,” she said, “because we’d be coming back to that idea later.”

Mirroring means bouncing the teacher’s ideas back at her. “So you used questions to draw students’ attention to important details,” I said. Andi continued, “Because we were going to have a grand conversation after the read aloud, I wanted students thinking deeply about the characters’ feelings so that they could relate. I think it paid off; they made personal connections and when I asked them to write afterward, almost everyone already had a memory in mind.”

Asserting, inviting, and mirroring encouraged Andi to reflect productively, reinforcing for herself things that went well.  In this example, all three moves are illustrated, conveniently in the AIM order. However, it’s not necessary to use them in this sequence or even to use all three.  I just like the acronym because, in the midst of a coaching conversation, I need something to anchor my thinking, and this acronym serves the purpose.  It keeps me from slipping to my habitual coaching modes of recommending and questioning. AIM keeps me focused on an affirming stance.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

Veteran teachers can continue to improve:



Bookmark this page for contests and giveaways!



Using writing pre-assessment to build on what students already know:



Rethinking how we assess students:



Recipe for instructional success – The routine stays the same, but the content changes.  Here are examples from math:


That’s it for this week.  Happy Coaching!

Was this helpful?  Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)


Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!

Friday, January 26, 2018

Questions as Invitations

As you’ve no doubt noticed, the title for this post is, “Questions as Invitations.”  Full disclosure: The subtitle should be “Coaching for Word Nerds.”

As a literacy teacher, I’ve taught lessons about the importance of word choice.  One right word is better than ten almost-right ones, or, as Mark Twain said, “The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter – ‘tis the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.”
Leave out the adverbs and choose the right verb. Leave out the adjectives and choose the right noun.  When writing, words matter. When coaching, words matter, too.

Take the word “celebrate.”  I agree with Ruth Ayers that celebration is a good thing.  Even the word celebration sounds celebratory!  You can take advantage of that word power when coaching.  After an observation, you can jump right in with “What do you want to celebrate about that lesson?”  I promise, you’re going to get a better response than if you ask, “What was successful about today’s lesson?”  Don’t you feel happier just thinking about it?

Instead of asking, “What frustrated (or confused) you during the lesson?” ask, “What were you puzzled by?”  Being puzzled positions the teacher as a problem-solver rather than someone overwrought by the situation.

And don’t ask for evidence unless you want the teacher to feel she is on trial.  Ask what clues the teacher noticed during a lesson that indicated students’ understanding (or lack of it).  Being a detective is more fun than being a lawyer (that’s true in the movies, anyway!).

Even the form of the word we choose can make a difference.  Asking, “What challenged you?” positions the teacher as someone boldly facing challenges. Asking, “What challenges did you have?” gives an image of an uncontrollable avalanche. 

And if a lesson flopped, and you and the teacher both know it, sometimes it can work to overstate the situation.  A little trouble calls for revision, but a big problem calls for an overhaul.  This out-of-context word can take the edge off of a difficult situation rather than the typical, “What would you do differently.”

Some questions feel like invitations, welcoming participation.  The words we choose can urge and encourage, suggest and prompt.  In situations where we’ve already established relationships, or where teaching is sailing smoothly along, careful attention to words isn’t quite as important.  But in less-ideal situations, if we want our teacher-guests to whole-heartedly participate in the coaching conversation we’ve invited them to, we must be careful wielders of the word.  What are your favorite coaching words? How will you wield them? Here’s to coaching word nerds!


This week, you might want to take a look at:

Vocab review using “Word Sneak” (with a digital twist):



Sign up for news about the 2018 Global Read Aloud:


Books with resilient characters:

Spread positivity – morale boosts for teachers:



Reminder to talk “with” students, not “at” them:


That’s it for this week.  Happy Coaching!

Was this helpful?  Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)


Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!

Saturday, January 20, 2018

Get Real! Questions in the Coaching Conversation

Over the years, I have collected stacks of GIR conferencing guides. This week, I went through one pile with a particular purpose: I was looking for some bad questions to use as illustrations.  It delighted me that I didn’t find any negative examples in the stack from the group of coaches I’ve been working with recently.  Digging a little deeper though, I found some examples from an old stack that I hope will be illustrative. As we look at questions that don’t work, we become clearer about what makes a good coaching question.

Here are a few questions that seem ineffective and why I think they wouldn’t work:

Question: “How are you able to check for understanding if you are lecturing?” 
This is code for: You are lecturing too much.  You need to stop lecturing and check for understanding.
Possible solution: Make a recommendation.  It might also be possible to help the teacher get to the same point through a series of questions, if s/he has the background and self-awareness.

Question: “Why don’t you structure students’ conversation?
This is code for: You need to provide structures for students’ conversation.
Possible solution: Ask a more open question, such as “What structures might make students’ conversations more purposeful?” Or you might make recommendations about ways that students’ conversation could be structured.

Question: How can you ensure the information you give students is correct?
This is code for: You included incorrect information in your presentation.  You need to understand the content before you teach a lesson.
Possible solution: Offer resources for upcoming lessons.

Question: What would be the benefit of writing out your day?
This is code for: Writing out your day will help you stay on schedule.
Possible solution: Show the teacher tools that you and others use for scheduling. Then ask what she thinks will work for her.

Question: Did you set a purpose before the lesson? 
This might work if the coach was not there for the lesson, especially if setting a purpose was a goal they had previously identified.  If the coach was there and such a goal hadn’t been set, this question might be a shaming one, however.

Question: Why do we have students self-reflect? 
This sounds like a test question, not an honest inquiry.
Possible solution: Ask about past successes: “Can you think of a lesson where you included student reflection? Did you see benefits from it? Why was the reflection successful?

Question: Why is modeling important in an early childhood classroom?
Another test question. Ask: “Which parts of the lesson will students need to have modeled?”

Question: How many times did you stop students?
This is probably a rhetorical question. Would we really expect a teacher to have kept tabs on this while teaching?
Possible solution: Give the teacher the opportunity to bring up her own concerns about the lesson. This might lead to the teacher asking for recommendations about classroom management.

Question: How many times did you move clips?
This is probably another rhetorical question about classroom management.  I’m not sure if the answer this coach was searching for was none or lots, but this is probably code for either “you didn’t move clips (for student behavior) and you should have” or “you moved them too much.”  If there was an underlying issue with classroom management, addressing that issue with a recommendation or question would be more useful. 

Question: What did you notice about the students when they were on the carpet during the writing lesson?  (followed by) What are some ways to help the students to focus and pay attention?
The coach was probably fishing for the teacher to bring up concerns about students’ attention while on the carpet. Although the question might be considered an opportunity for the teacher to bring up her own concerns, the way it is phrased probably would leave the teacher feeling deflated instead of empowered.  In this scenario, getting rid of the first question and leading with the second would probably be more effective. 

Question: Could the intervention you are doing with Natalie be applied to other students?
This is code for: The intervention you are doing with Natalie could be applied to other students.
Possible solution: Praise the effectiveness of the intervention. Look with the teacher at data to determine others who might benefit.

This leads to some guidelines we can keep in mind as we craft effective coaching questions:

Don’t

*Don’t ask questions when a recommendation is needed. Gauge your approach based on the teacher’s background and reflectiveness. If impactful solutions are likely to be found with the teacher doing the talking, by all means ask a question. However, if it’s more likely that the coach will be the source of effective solutions, a recommendation is in order.

*Similarly, don’t disguise a recommendation as a question. Make a recommendation if that’s what’s needed.

*Don’t ask questions when the problem was created by a lack of resources (or lack of accessing available resources). Instead, provide or make teachers aware of available resources.

*Don’t ask questions that point a finger of shame. Questioning with the intent to point out what a teacher did wrong asks a teacher to be self-incriminating, and that is not a good feeling.

Do

*Ask real questions. A real question is one where you are truly curious about the teacher’s response, where there are multiple possibilities.

*Ask questions that encourage teachers to reflect on past successes. This is more likely to support growth. Past successes demonstrate capacity, even if the practice is not yet consistent. We are working within a teacher’s ZPD.

*Ask reasonable questions. Are you asking about something you would have been able to notice and note in the midst of instruction? Remember that when you observe a lesson, you have the advantage of being on the outside looking in, so you may notice things that it wouldn’t be reasonable for the teacher to have observed. Reasonable questions can be answered if the teacher plays back the lesson in her mind.  Your extra eyes are valuable and can uncover important needs. Just don’t ask questions that presuppose the teacher will have noticed these same things.

*Ask broad questions to open a conversation and invite participation. Later in the conversation, more specific questions will be helpful.

For practice, you might want to pull out some of the GIR conferencing forms you’ve completed in the past or any other notes you’ve kept on coaching conversations. How are your questions?  Would any have benefitted from revision?  If not, do a happy dance.  If yes, you can do a happy dance, too, knowing you have some examples to practice with so that your questions will be even better next time!

As you revise the key questions on the GIR conferencing form, say the question in your head, or even out load.  Will it sound natural coming out of your mouth? This is your chance to get the language just right.

If we write out a few questions in advance when planning for a coaching conversation, we have the chance to revise the language for best results.  When we take the time to do this, not only does it make these few questions more productive, it gets us in the habit of framing questions in more productive ways.  Then, when the myriad of unplanned questions are posed, there’s a greater likelihood that they’ll also be impactful.


This week, you might want to take a look at:

Check out our newly-available book (just $2.99) about keeping early-career teachers in the profession, and hashtag #StayinTeaching when you Tweet to remind us of this goal! The problem-solving protocols in chapter 1 (and appendices) of the book could be used in many contexts for getting at root causes:



This video about asking coaching questions, from unconscious incompetence to conscious competence:



Podcast with Penny Kittle – Engaging Readers and Building Better Writers:



Coaching for routines (think about the questions):



Ideas for teaching media literacy:



Was this helpful?  Please share!
What to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom right)

Like on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch for more coaching and teaching tips!