How
can instructional coaches help teachers make sense of the mountains of
assessment data that have been collected?
As
the school year gets underway, teaching teams are tasked with using assessment
data to guide whole group and small group instruction and identify intervention
needs. Don’t try to digest all the numbers at once! Discussion protocols –
structured processes to focus communication – can encourage effective
collaboration during data discussions. Below I’ll describe several protocols
that, when used together, support structured discussions about data.
One
of the protocols I’ve used is the National School Reform’s protocol for examining the data. Working in small groups,
teachers are given a set of data to consider. Multiple rounds are introduced by
the facilitator, asking teachers questions that encourage them to look at the
data differently, first by responding silently in writing and then through
discussion in their small group. During round 1, teachers record and discuss
what the data tells them at first blush. What jumps out and seems significant?
What surprises them? What patterns are noted? During round 2, teachers make
inferences about the data. What is it telling us? What is it not telling us?
They look beyond obvious relationships. Round 3 is a time to look for
celebrations. What good news is there in the data?
These
celebrations are a good place to pause the protocol. Take a break (or come back
another day for a fresh start). Pausing on a happy high can fuel the important
next steps.
Come
back for Round 4, which looks at the flip side of celebrations. What problems
of practice might be underlying this data? This round of cause-and-effect
thinking can be overwhelming. You might devote a whole meeting to just this
step and unpack it a bit if the data warrants a deeper dive to identify possible
sources of the problem, It’s only when we really get to the cause
that effective solutions
start to surface. A combination of a fishbone analysis and the 5 Whys protocol can get your team’s thinking
going in the right direction.
The Fishbone is a structured team process for identifying underlying factors or causes of an event. The product of the team’s work is a cause/effect diagram that might look something like this:
Or
this, if you’ve got a group of creative teachers!
(These Fishbone diagrams unpack a problem not related to student achievement, but you get the idea!)
Fishbones
help us consider lots of alternate causes and sort ideas into useful
categories.
Here
are the steps in the process. Working in
small groups, ask:
1. What is the problem/effect? Be
clear & specific. Be careful not to define the problem in terms of a
solution! Write this at the head of the fish.
2. What might be the major categories of
causes of the problem? (for example, materials, policy factors,
people/staff factors, etc.). Write these on the large skeletal bones.
3. Brainstorm possible causes for each
category. These are the smaller bones.
4. For each cause, ask, “Why does this
happen?” Write these sub-causes as branches on your diagram.
Asking
“Why?” multiple times along the way can ensure deep causal thinking rather than
more obvious solutions that get too-easily tagged. In the fishbone analysis, it
means adding sub-causes to the “bone structure” through fine-grained analysis.
Here’s
how the 5 Why’s Protocol works:
Someone states what they think is a cause. For example, if I ask someone why they were late for work, they
might answer, “I was late for work because I ran out of gas.” Asking, “Why did you run out of gas?” reveals yet another layer to the
problem: “I ran out of gas because I didn’t buy any on my way to work.” “Why didn’t you buy any on your
way to work?” you might ask. “Because I didn’t have any money!” “Why didn’t you have any money?”
“Because I bought these gorgeous shoes last night!” might be the
response. “Why?” “Because
when I see a gorgeous pair of shoes, I just have to have them even though I
already have a closet full of shoes!”
Aha!
Now we have revealed that the root cause of being late to work is a shoe
fetish! Without the 5 Whys protocol, we would never have known! Of course, 5 is
not a magic number. The point is, go deep enough to get at real answers to the
question. The final “Why” should lead to a root-cause statement that helps the
team take action.
The
fishbone analysis, accompanied by the 5 Why’s, encourages a deeper
consideration of the data and a focus on underlying problems. When we see dips
in the data of student achievement, it’s most effective to solve
directly-stated problems rather than proposing solutions to surface-level
issues.
Finally,
it’s time for the 5th and final round of the protocol for examining the data. During this round, the group
describes their key conclusions and recommendations. Taking this layer-by-layer
approach stops us from jumping to unwarranted conclusions about assessment
data.
If tackling
assessment data feels like an overwhelming task, a structured analysis approach
can make all the difference. By using discussion protocols, teaching teams can
focus on what matters most, listen to each other’s insights, and move from
simply reviewing numbers to making informed decisions that benefit students.
Thoughtful collaboration turns mountains of data into clear, actionable steps
for instruction and intervention.
(More
ideas for peeling back the layers of assessment data coming next week!)
This week, you might want to
take a look at:
The Fishbone is a structured team process for identifying underlying factors or causes of an event. The product of the team’s work is a cause/effect diagram that might look something like this:
(These Fishbone diagrams unpack a problem not related to student achievement, but you get the idea!)
How
and why to support and hold onto experienced teachers:
https://hechingerreport.org/opinion-heres-how-we-hold-on-to-experienced-teachers-give-them-the-support-they-need/
Decorations vs. anchor charts:
https://www.responsiveclassroom.org/clearing-the-way-for-new-growth/
Starting the year with picture books to build math identities:
https://choiceliteracy.com/article/fostering-math-identities-with-picture-books/
Ideas for helping students who are in the fight or flight mode:
https://www.teachingchannel.com/blog/fight-flight-freeze
Mentors need new teachers (not just vise versa):
https://ncte.org/blog/2020/01/mentors-need-new-teachers/
That’s it for this week. Happy Coaching!
Want more coaching tips? Check out my book, Differentiated Mentoring & Coaching in Education: From Preservice Teacher to Expert Practitioner, available from Teachers College Press! I’m so excited to share it with you! You can use the code: FDNS25 for 20% off. Click here and I’ll email you the free Book Group Study Guide that includes questions, prompts, and activities you can use as you share the book with colleagues. I hope you’ll love this book as much as I loved making it for you!
https://hechingerreport.org/opinion-heres-how-we-hold-on-to-experienced-teachers-give-them-the-support-they-need/
Decorations vs. anchor charts:
https://www.responsiveclassroom.org/clearing-the-way-for-new-growth/
Starting the year with picture books to build math identities:
https://choiceliteracy.com/article/fostering-math-identities-with-picture-books/
Ideas for helping students who are in the fight or flight mode:
https://www.teachingchannel.com/blog/fight-flight-freeze
Mentors need new teachers (not just vise versa):
https://ncte.org/blog/2020/01/mentors-need-new-teachers/
That’s it for this week. Happy Coaching!
Want more coaching tips? Check out my book, Differentiated Mentoring & Coaching in Education: From Preservice Teacher to Expert Practitioner, available from Teachers College Press! I’m so excited to share it with you! You can use the code: FDNS25 for 20% off. Click here and I’ll email you the free Book Group Study Guide that includes questions, prompts, and activities you can use as you share the book with colleagues. I hope you’ll love this book as much as I loved making it for you!
No comments:
Post a Comment