I know two amazing math brains. They
can both do calculus, applied mathematics, and whatever else it is that amazing
math brains do. They know their stuff.
One of them is an amazing teacher. The other is not.
When one sits down with a student to
tutor him through a difficult math problem, he prompts and supports and
explains and leads his student into understanding.
When the other sits down with a
student to tutor him through a difficult math problem, he demonstrates how to
solve the problem. He gets frustrated and can’t understand why the student
can’t do it, too, after the clear procedure he has provided.
I know two amazing math brains. One is a teacher. The other is not. It is clear that teaching requires more than
simply knowing the content. The skills necessary to support a learner along the
path to discovery go beyond content knowledge. Pedagogical knowledge supports
good teaching.
Similarly, there is more to good
coaching than knowing the content. Even being a good teacher, having
pedagogical knowledge, is not enough. Another layer of skills is required.
These complex relational skills make the difference between successful and
unsuccessful coaching. A conceptual simple view of these skills is portrayed in
the GIR Coaching Model.
When coaching, bring with you all of
your expertise in academic content and pedagogy. Let the GIR model guide you in
putting it to good use as you support teachers. The soft skills of coaching are the additional
layer of knowing you need as an instructional leader.
This
week, you might want to take a look at:
Tips
on having influence that are just right for coaches:
Concept
development using the four-fold strategy:
Try
using it with primary source documents:
A
guide to Pinterest for educators:
Free
(recorded) webinar on coaching the coaches (no registration):
Using
reading response letters in middle grades:
That’s it for this week.
Happy Coaching!
Was this helpful? Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click
“Follow” (bottom right)
No comments:
Post a Comment