The
group of kindergartners were compliant and busy throughout the lesson I
observed. They counted the items in
their boxes routinely, dutifully writing in their notebooks. They came to the carpet when called, sitting
in orderly rows. They did what they had
been asked to do. Is that where the
problem lay?
As
I reflected on the lesson, where kindergartners worked with a partner to count
and record their thinking in their math notebooks, I was struck by how
incredibly similar the lesson was to one I’d observed in that room months
before. Students were more certain of
the routine, to be sure, and that was part of the problem. They seemed to be going through the motions without
much thought.
As
I pondered the lesson and the debrief conversation I’d soon have with Bethany,
several concerns came to mind. Students
didn’t seem challenged. The lesson didn’t
seem differentiated. The closing
discussion seemed unintentional. Overall, the lesson seemed to lack a focus
that would move students’ thinking forward.
Bethany
and I had had many coaching conversations.
I’d given recommendations, some of them about the very things that
seemed to be troubling me. She was at a
different place now in terms of her ability to reflect. She was more aware of how what she did as a teacher impacted what her students did as learners. I felt that asking questions would help her
recognize her own intentions in the “counting collections” lesson that was
repeated several times every week, with little evident variation.
So
I looked back over my list of concerns and jotted down a question related to
each. How were the objectives for this
lesson different from the counting collections lesson a month ago? How did you
decide which students would work together? Which box they would take? How did you
determine which student examples to share during closure? How did students do with this activity –
specifically? (What were the results?) I
worked until I felt the questions were right and in the most logical
order. Then I was ready for my meeting
with Bethany.
The
table below shows the concerns, questions, and outcomes of our
conversation. As we talked, some of the questions
fell flat. Others demonstrated Bethany’s
forethought that hadn’t been evident to me; a pleasant surprise. Importantly, two questions provided “ah-hahs”
that seem to continue to impact Bethany’s planning and teaching. Her take-aways, she said, were that she
needed something to help her stick with her well-thought-out lesson plan (she
determined to create PowerPoints to guide herself through the lesson). And, importantly, she wanted to be clearer,
for both herself and her students, about learning outcomes---while she planned,
while she taught, and while she evaluated student work.
Going
into our debrief conversation, I hadn’t been sure what the outcomes would be,
but Bethany’s responses to my questions illuminated for her where she wanted to
turn her attention. I’m sometimes
surprised, but usually pleased, when questions lead a coaching conversation!
Concern
|
Question
|
Outcome
|
Students
know the routine but don’t seem challenged by the work.
|
How
do objectives for this lesson differ from counting collection lessons a month
ago? A week ago?
|
Teacher response: More focus on base 10.
Coaching response: How did the students know?
|
There
doesn’t seem to be intentional differentiation.
|
How
did you decide which students would be working together?
|
Teacher response: Intentionally paired a lower
and higher student.
|
Same as above.
|
How
did Ss decide which box to take?
|
Teacher response: They chose. All sets are over 20. They are supposed to
take a box they haven’t used yet.
|
It
looks like teacher just shared whatever notebook was on the top of the pile.
She doesn’t seem intentional about which work to show and what it will demonstrate.
|
How
did you decide which student notebooks to show during discussion?
|
Teacher response: I could make a point based on any student’s
work.
|
Same as above.
|
Why
didn't you play the video you’d planned on you’d planned on to give you a chance to review student work?
|
Teacher response: (initially) Didn’t need to; (after
thoughtful pause). It probably would
have helped with the objective. There
were other things in the lesson plan I left out, too.
|
Does
not seem to have a focused objective.
|
Did
you evaluate students based on whether they got the correct #? Results?
|
Teacher response: (Indirect; not sure she has checked students’
work)
|
This week, you might want to
take a look at:
Teaching critical literacy in the era
of fake news:
Using “Second Set Partners” to build
discussion skills:
Speed dating with favorite books:
Summarizing in science:
Spotlight on classroom assessment:
That’s it for this week. Happy Coaching!
No comments:
Post a Comment