When
coaching coaches this week, I recommended recommending. That’s a confusing
statement!!! Let me explain.
I’ve
been working with Vanessa for some time. She is a smart, dedicated teacher who
is also a committed coach for Kasey, the student teacher in her classroom. She
had asked for time to talk because she was concerned about Kasey’s performance.
When we sat down together, her frustration was apparent. Her biggest concern
was that, because her intern wasn’t passing muster, her students’ learning was
suffering. Whereas she had formerly felt confident about her intern’s progress,
she now felt things had stalled, and she wasn’t seeing the type of teaching she
expected. Vanessa complained that her intern’s pace was off—sometimes belaboring
a point and sometimes skimming over it. She was also concerned that there were
times when the intern spoke negatively to students. It was supposed to feel
like holding high expectations, but her students were feeling deflated by the intern’s
comments.
I
asked a few questions to get a better feel for the situation and to give Vanessa
a chance to think it through. Vanessa gave an example of a planning
conversation she’d had with Kasey about an upcoming math lesson: How she
reviewed the lesson with Kasey and asked about her plan to grade the papers
while students were working. “I asked her, ‘Do you think you’ll have time to
grade the papers before the students share their examples?’” I could tell from Vanessa’s
tone that she felt quite confident this wouldn’t work. “I decided to let her go
and see what happened,” she said.
Vanessa
described the lesson and her frustration with it as the students began
explaining their examples without Kasey’s full attention—because she was still
grading papers. Vanessa thought she had done the right thing by giving Kasey
the experience to try something and learn from her efforts. But the resulting
frustration for Vanessa and her students was a sure indication that this plan
wasn’t working.
I
talked about the important role of coaching for ensuring that students receive
solid instruction. “Coaching needs to make up the difference between what Kasey
is able to do and what your students need, so that students will get
appropriate instruction,” I said. “Right now,” I continued, “asking questions
isn’t working. It’s not filling that gap.” So, I recommended that Vanessa take
a step backward in the GIR model. She had been using questioning as her primary
coaching move, hoping that her careful questions would elicit effective
planning and perceptive reflection. But instead, both Vanessa and her students
were frustrated. Instead of asking questions, Vanessa needed to use a coaching
move that provided more support. Making solid recommendations could result in
appropriate instruction for her students.
Soon,
Kasey will be ready to move forward again. Soon, Vanessa will be able to use
less-supportive coaching moves. But for now, Vanessa’s coaching is ensuring
that the bottom line is met. Coaches make student learning the top priority,
even if it means taking a step backward in the coaching model. When Vanessa was
frustrated, I took a step backward, too. My recommendation helped Vanessa clear
her head and see a positive path forward.
This week, you might want to
take a look at:
Twitter-style exit tickets:
Coaching Basics - Routines:
Spotlight on personalized professional
development:
An engaging technology-based team game
to review vocab:
This picture book, that perfectly
describes the power of books and what total engagement (or “flow”) feels like:
That’s it for this week. Happy
Coaching!
No comments:
Post a Comment