Through
my work with student teachers, I learn important things about coaching. At my
institution, we call cooperating teachers “mentors,” but I see it as a coaching
role. We are nearing the end of a semester, so I am interviewing student teachers
(we call them “interns”), because I am always trying to learn from the year,
always trying to improve.
This
week, I interviewed Christy, a creative, fun-loving fourth-grade intern. The
first part of her year-long internship was in kindergarten, and it immediately
felt like home. Although she eventually came to love it, teaching in fourth
grade was a challenge at first – she wasn’t sure how to relate to these big
kids, and the content scared her a bit. Compounding that was the fact that she
felt she and her mentor were a mismatch. She said they were so different in
their thought-processes and personality types. Her mentor was a linear
thinking. She was not. So, even though they were both trying really hard, in
the beginning, they just didn’t mesh.
Thankfully,
they eventually came to understand one another’s needs. Christy knew her mentor
needed detailed lesson plans turned in early. And, after an especially rocky interaction,
Christy shared what she really needed from her mentor: Ongoing words of
affirmation.
“Affirmation
is my love language,” Christy told me. “I’m a people pleaser. I want everyone
to like me!” Christy shared these truths
about herself with her mentor. The next day, after Christy taught a lesson that
went well, she came back after recess to find a sticky note on her desk. “That
was awesome. YOU are awesome,” it said. Even though that was months ago, Christy
still has that sticky note. It meant so much to her! And it was a turning point
in the mentoring relationship.
Affirming
is an important coaching move. It’s one of the final phases of the GIR model
not because we don’t use it sooner, but because the other moves drop away,
making affirming the dominant coaching move. Many mentors tell me they affirm
all along the way. Christy’s story reminds us that some teachers need
affirmation more than others. Her mentor had a different intern earlier in the
year, who had a great experience. And once Christy’s mentor knew her “love
language,” she had a great experience, too.
You’ve
probably heard about love languages. The authors, Gary Chapman and Paul White,
have adapted these for the workplace, calling them “languages of appreciation.”
Number one is words of affirmation. They explain that, for many people, what
others think of them is very important. And everyone could use a good word from
time to time.
Affirmation
can come in personal, one-on-one conversations or in front of others. It can be
written down or said out loud. We can affirm an effort, an accomplishment, or a
character trait. The important thing is that the affirmation is sincere. From Christy’s
experience, I learned that, for those whose language of appreciation is
affirmation, it also needs to be frequent.
Thankfully,
Christy and her mentor eventually found the cadence of coaching conversation
that was right for them. If you are using the GIR Coaching Model to guide your
interactions with teachers, think about the role that affirmation, and other
languages of appreciation, play for the individual teachers you are working
with. Being generous with authentic affirmations shows appreciation and can
energize a coaching relationship.
This
week, you might want to take a look at:
This
podcast on the power of choice:
https://www.speedofcreativity.org/2021/03/16/podcast476-the-power-of-choice-by-claude-larson/
Ideas
for showcasing coaching work:
https://blog.teachboost.com/showcasing-the-impact-of-instructional-coaching
Effective
Use of Questions as a Teaching Tool:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3776909/
How
to cultivate effective peer response to writing:
https://you.stonybrook.edu/eglblog/2017/03/22/how-to-promote-effective-peer-response/
Building
coaching relationships through love, humility, and trust:
https://instructionalcoaching.com/article-dialogue-trust/
That’s
it for this week. Happy Coaching!
Was
this helpful? Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom
right)
Follow on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch or Twitter
@vscollet for more coaching and teaching tips! You can
also find me at VickiCollet.com
This
week, I got a cryptic text from my adult daughter. No context, just a question:
What does the research say about praise?
I
was in the middle of a busy day, so I didn’t stop to ask questions. I just sent
an equally quick response: Praise effort more than talent. Be specific.
A
couple of days later, I shared this same advice with coaches and asked for
examples of praise that was specific or effort-focused. Two coaches were quick
to jump in and share wonderful things about teachers they are working with.
One
said, “Peter is so good at listening to students. He always puts them first. It
makes his instruction so much stronger. When students are working, he is having
conversations with them, one-on-one, that start by acknowledging where they are
and then push them forward.”
Another
coach described the amazing STEM lesson a teacher had just taught, where
students worked effectively in small groups to solve a problem in a scenario connected
with their unit on immigration. Students got their hands on materials and
worked collaboratively. Because of the pandemic, we haven’t been doing anything
like that this year. But restrictions eased about a week ago. The coach described
how pleased she was that this teacher took the risk, in April, to diverge from year-long
routines. The lesson, she said, was a great success.
If
was clear the coaches recognized the value of what these two teachers were
doing. They sang their praises to our group of coaching colleagues. But my next
question cut them short. “Have you told them?”
Although
both coaches recognized the teachers’ strengths, they had not taken the time to
say so. Maybe because some coaching models discourage use of praise. Maybe
because they are so focused on improvement that they are looking for things to
change rather than things to applaud.
Because
my research with the GIR model clearly identifies affirmation and praise as
effective coaching moves, I confidently encouraged these coaches to think about
specific, focused praise they could offer. We took a few minutes to get this
specific praise down in writing on the GIR Conferencing Plan (see below).
Because if we don’t plan for it, it may not happen. And praise it too
important. We can’t let the opportunity slide.
During
this coaching session, I had the song, “Have I Told You Lately,” rolling
through my head. (My dad was a country-western singer, so it was the Hank
Williams version rather than the Rod Stewart one you may now be humming!). Even
though coaching may not be about love, the song’s reminder is relevant. Ask
yourself: Have I told teachers lately about the good things they are doing? If
not, maybe its time to do so. In the words of Hank Williams, “Well, darling, I’m
telling you now!”
Week
after week, I’ve been writing here about the Gradual Increase of Responsibility
Model for coaching. Recently, I was asked to provide an explanation for why I
would want to increase teachers’ responsibility. Don’t
teachers already have enough responsibility? After all, they are already responsible
for lunch counts, permission slips, and attendance; completing required administrative
documentation; collecting fundraising envelopes and picture money; and being on
bus, recess, or hall duty. This year, teachers have also been responsible for
making sure students wear masks and stay spaced. They’ve been responsible for
wiping down high-touch surfaces or managing new technology. And the list goes
on. Don’t teachers already have plenty of responsibility?
My
answer is a resounding, “yes,” and perhaps some of those things could be taken
off their plates. Yet, I continue to advocate for increasing teachers’ responsibility
in the important and job-appropriate practice of instructional decision making,
because that responsibility is life-giving. Using their brains to
think about how to best support students’ learning is empowering and creates
energy for teachers. It’s probably the reason they entered the profession in
the first place. Giving teachers more of this kind of responsibility allows
them to exercise their agency, using all they know about content, pedagogy, and
their students.
Coaching
with the Gradual Increase of Responsibility Model increases teachers’ role in
their own professional learning. Like the Gradual
Release of Responsibility Model for teaching reading comprehension, which was
the conceptual guide for the model’s development, the GIR Coaching Model
suggests differing levels of support and increasing responsibility for teacher-as-learner.
The Model is a coaching guide for choosing the right level of support for
instructional decision-making – support that guides, challenges, or affirms to
ensure that teachers are empowered and students consistently experience effective
instruction. Teachers’ agency is honored and their efficacy increases as
they design and witness improved instruction.
The teachers I’ve been working with this year have been
stripped of much of their professional agency. I understand why: the district
felt a tightly-scripted curriculum would allow easier pivots between in-person
and remote learning. Yet this move has been energy-draining for teachers.
Thankfully, as the pandemic eases, these teachers are being given more
flexibility. This week, as we worked to plan lessons from scratch, I saw energy
and joy flowing during their work. The first-grade team got excited about bringing
in baby plants for students to match to photos of their grown-up counterparts;
the third-grade team can’t wait to see how their students handle the boat-building
STEM challenge they are linking to their immigration unit; the fourth-grade
team will have their students act out the Greek myths they’ve been reading
about. As we planned, teachers kept using the word “excited” – they can’t wait
to teach these lessons. One teacher said, “This is going to be my favorite
lesson all year!” The energy in the room was palpable, and the joy teachers
felt as they considered their students’ needs and their own instructional
repertoires was evident in their smiles and laughter. Yes, there was lots of
laughter during these lesson-planning sessions!
Increasing responsibility by giving teachers the chance to
do more of what they love about teaching is powerful! Increasing their instructional agency
acknowledges teachers’ professionalism. It recognizes their role as agents for
change. The GIR model is a pathway that enables continual growth of the knowledge,
interpersonal resources, and motivation required to improve teaching and
learning. Teachers drive instructional improvement as they determine new ideas
and methods to incorporate into their teaching.
So, should we
be asking less or more of teachers? My
answer will always be that we should require less of what does not require teachers’
professionalism, and more of what does.
This week, you might want to take a
look at:
Compassion, connection, curiosity, and
care as leadership characteristics:
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/dec20/vol78/num04/Meena-Srinivasan-on-Mindful-School-Leadership.aspx
What
goes into a culturally-sustaining classroom:
https://ncte.org/blog/2018/08/first-day-actions-for-a-culturally-sustaining-classroom-environment/
Publishing
parties for authentic writing purpose:
http://wonderteacher.com/8-tips-for-a-great-publishing-party/
What
coaches need to flourish:
https://blog.teachboost.com/three-psychological-needs-of-an-ic
LOTS
and HOTS: a taxonomy of digital learning:
https://www.teachthought.com/critical-thinking/blooms-digital-taxonomy-verbs-21st-century-students/
That’s
it for this week. Happy Coaching!
Was
this helpful? Please share!
Want to know about new posts? Click “Follow” (bottom
right)
Follow on Facebook at: facebook.com/mycoachescouch or Twitter @vscollet for more
coaching and teaching tips! You can also find me at VickiCollet.com